Islamic Assassination Policy

Islamic Assassination Policy

Wednesday, November 22, 2006

Under Islamic Sharia Law, assassinating political rivals is a valid geopolitical instrument in the expansion of fundamentalist Islam. Assassinations have their roots in Islamic irredentist beliefs, the belief that once an Islamic presence is secured on any territory on Earth, including the construction of mosques, that land belongs to Islam forever. Spain and France for example, were once fully controlled by Islamic forces in history. The fact that Spanish and French nation-states reemerged after Islam was removed from those territories is irrelevant to Islamist intellectuals. Islam was able to push its way into Europe through invasion, so vast amounts of European territory permanently belong to Islam forever. Islamic irredentism in Sharia Law is Islamic policy.

When Islam appeared six centuries after the death of Christ, the Prophet Muhammed declared that there would be no more prophets after him. Any prophet to appear after the death of the Prophet Muhammed would be a false-prophet. Islam recognizes Christ and Christianity only to the extent that Christ was a prophet, not as the son of God as Christians define Christ. It was necessary politically for the Prophet Muhammed to take that position because if he didn’t then Christians would have liquidated the Islamic religion and all claims made by the Prophet Muhammed in the sixth century. So by recognizing, in part, Christian beliefs just to ensure its own survival, Islamic adherents since those days now claim full control over all future religious deity constructs of value. It is nothing short of an uncompromising theocratic foundation of totalitarianism.

Activities such as those described above are not unusual for religious institutions. Religions attempt to define their religious constructs as that which has been specially-selected by God to lead all of humankind and make obsolete previous beliefs in deity. Islam’s determination that no more prophets would appear after the Prophet Muhammed because it was the “will of Allah” is purge activity, political violence that fundamentalist Islam specializes in with great efficiency. Sharia Law then can be the only acceptable outcome for the desired global Caliphate system. Any entity that stands in the way of the global Caliphate is defined as the “infidel” (unbeliever), the unconverted, and humans that must be eliminated because it is problematic to fundamentalist Islamic intellectuals that such interference with the global Caliphate agenda resists the “truth” of radicalized Islam. Since Islamic clerics claim that Allah instructs them to perform a proselytizing role to convert the entire world to Islam, the spectrum of potential interference to those plans covers tremendous amounts of ideological territory and automatically forces Islam into conflict with thousands of differing and powerful belief systems.

According to Islamic Sharia Law and the Koran, believers of Islam have the duty to convert all humans to the Islamic faith, to surrender to Islam’s “truth”. Islamic clerics and Imams are persistently studying foreign nation-states systems in the west and within unstable Islamic and non-Islamic states for power brokers that directly interfere with the spread of the global Caliphate agenda. Islam, like communist Trotskyism, creates body states that have surrendered to Islamic Sharia Law and theocratic governance and then converts the energy of the peoples within those states to act as antibodies to all external influences originating from outside states. The antibodies must destroy the infiltrate, or more accurately, the infidel. It is a purpose-driven, marginally philosophical, outcome.

Notions of tolerance and cooperation, conflict resolution and shared concerns over the fate of other individuals, groups and belief sets are of no concern to the Islamic fundamentalist. As in Iraq, it is convert or be purged in a totalitarian way. The politically-motivated killing through assassination, terrorism, or any other method by Islamic fundamentalists of non-Islamic peoples is justified because to resist is to prevent the will of God, the will of Allah, to establish a global Caliphate system that is based upon the fundamentalist Islamic truth that Islam claims to possess over the rest of humanity.

It is a very dangerous miscalculation by the politician who claims that Islam is a “religion of peace” when scientifically measurable evidence proves that Islamic fundamentalism is performing a Trotskyite expansion on a global scale. Every fundamentalist Islamic nation-state that seeks the Caliphate is not modeling its activities to internalize its institutions as the Stalinist model defines it. What is going on is clearly theocratic Trotskyism.

The most recent proof of this is the Syrian and Iranian-backed Hezbollah terrorist assassination of Pierre Gemayel this afternoon, a Christian-Lebanese cabinet member of the Lebanese government that was killed in alignment with the theocratic Trotskyism model. Two cars were used in the assassination, one car striking the cabinet minister’s car from behind and the other slamming on the brakes to force Pierre Gemayel’s vehicle to stall and to damage vital engine components so there could be no escape. Once the assassins had Pierre Gemayel’s car trapped between their cars, gunmen exited the two cars carrying the Hezbollah assassins and then the terrorists perforated Pierre Gemayel’s driver side window with high-velocity 7.62 millimeter sprays of automatic weapons fire.

Lebanon is no stranger to political violence and political assassination. Former Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri was himself assassinated by Syrian and Iranian-backed Hezbollah terrorists that used stacked anti-tank mines placed underneath the roadway near a construction site and detonated by an electric initiating system as Rafiq Hariri was driving past the ambush site in his motorcade on his way to Beirut Airport.

The assassination of cabinet minister Pierre Gemayel places Lebanon at great risk for civil war and this is an outcome that Syria wants so that it can reestablish its control over the Lebanese client-state. When former Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri was assassinated, Syria was forced to remove its military occupation from Lebanon.

Even more importantly, Pierre Gemayel’s death greatly endangers the Lebanese government from total collapse. OPORD Analytical believes that there will be another assassination of a Lebanese cabinet minister within the next fifteen to thirty days, sixty days at the latest. The reason that Hezbollah terrorists will assassinate another cabinet minister of the Lebanese government is that Lebanon has structured its government in such a way as to only be legitimate if a certain number of cabinet ministers are in place to govern the Lebanese state. When ministers of the Lebanese government that were loyal to Hezbollah resigned recently, the legitimacy of Lebanon’s government was reduced to a variable of two cabinet ministers.

By killing two or more remaining cabinet ministers, Hezbollah and other Syrian and Iranian-backed terrorist organizations can claim that the government of Lebanon is no longer legitimate and a fundamentalist Islamic government can then be installed in a revolutionary way. Syria would fully support such an outcome because the Syrians want to send their military forces back into Lebanon so that Syria can regain access to Lebanese ports, assist Hezbollah terrorist cells with logistics support that has originated from Iran and flown to Syria itself, and provide Damascus with a buffer-zone in the international community that tries to legitimize its military actions in Lebanon as one of importance to Syrian national security.

We know that the ultimate objective of Syrian activity in Lebanon is access to Lebanese ports, resupply of Hezbollah terrorist cells and geopolitical influence in the region with the desired outcome to reclaim the Golan Heights from the State of Israel. Hezbollah’s recent war against the State of Israel was a test against democratic Israel to perfect new weapons systems such as guided anti-tank missiles against Israeli armor and mass saturation of Kyusha rockets to terrorize, maim and kill Israeli civilian populations. With the next phase of Hezbollah’s recent war against the State of Israel looming soon, the assassination of Pierre Gemayel simply accelerates the path to war.

Islamic Caliphate fundamentalists then are analyzing nation-states, their leaders and structures of governance to find weaknesses in those states to exploit using assassinations. Pierre Gemayel and the government that he supported prior to his assassination by Hezbollah were annoying obstacles for Hezbollah, Syria and Iran. The fact that only two Lebanese cabinet members need to be liquidated in order to instantly remove the viability of the current pro-western Lebanese government places all of the remaining Lebanese cabinet ministers in very grave danger of assassination.

The theocratic-Trotskyism model views assassination and the utilization of military power, including but not limited to terrorism, as a legitimate political weapon against those that resist fundamentalist Islam’s claim of universal truth. The assassinations become legitimate in the eyes of fundamentalist Islam because to the Islamic fundamentalist they have special knowledge of the universe. This ideological outcome is no different than communist totalitarianism in the sense that the elimination of opponents of communism is the authorized killing of “counter-revolutionaries”. As the counter-revolutionary was at the apex of the enemy of the Soviet-state, the unconverted infidel is at the apex of the enemy of the Islamic fundamentalist Caliphate agenda and the great interferer in the destruction of the State of Israel.

A weakened American position in Iraq as derived from domestic American political concerns directly feeds into these assassination activities. Syria and Iran believe that Israel is too weakened by recent world opinion and conflict with Hezbollah to resist regional transformation at the hands of Islamic fundamentalists.

Radical Islam is now beginning to remake the global order through the precision implementation of political assassinations. We recognize the “world order” as defined by western civilization. However, unless we defend and stabilize the current global order, nation-states such as Iran and Syria will deconstruct that order and replace it with the Islamic fundamentalist construct. Should Iran test its nuclear capability in February, 2007, fundamentalist Islam will then operate from within a protected sphere of an Islamic nuclear umbrella that will be used as policy against the west to accelerate even more the remaking of the global order.

Christopher Farmer

MS, National Security

To comment about this article, please use our forum!